Data on the adoption of Microsoft's newest OS shows uptake ranging from 1% to 9%. But most enterprises will likely wait until at least 2023 before broadly rolling out Windows 11.

采用微软最新操作系统的数据显示，用户增长率从1% 到9% 不等。但大多数企业可能至少要等到2023年才会全面推出 Windows 1

How fast is Windows 11 being adopted by users?

用户采用 Windows 11的速度有多快？

The answer appears to be "hardly at all" to "slowly," depending on which set of data you look at.

答案似乎是“几乎没有”或“缓慢”，这取决于您查看的是哪组数据。

New data from computer monitoring software provider AdDuplex indicates that Windows 11 uptake has reached nearly 9%; that number, however, contrasts sharply with a figure released by another vendor that showed the new platform with a less than 1% adoption rate.

来自计算机监控软件供应商 AdDuplex 的最新数据显示，Windows 11的采用率已经接近9% ; 然而，这个数字与另一家供应商发布的数据形成鲜明对比，该数据显示，新平台的采用率不到1% 。

It's been nearly two months since Microsoft launched Windows 11. System survey data, released by AdDuplex yesterday, showed Windows 11 adoption at 8.9% (with .03% of that figure attributed to Windows Insider program users).

微软发布 Windows 11已经将近两个月了。昨天 AdDuplex 公布的系统调查数据显示，Windows 11的使用率为8.9% (其中0.03% 来自 Windows 内部程序用户)。

Two weeks ago, IT asset management company Lansweeper pegged Windows 11 adoption at only 0.21% of PC users involved in its own software-based survey.

两周前，IT 资产管理公司兰斯维珀(Lansweeper)在自己的软件调查中指出，只有0.21% 的 PC 用户采用 Windows 11。

The primary reasons Windows 11 isn’t seeing higher adoption rates “are likely due to the harsh requirements in place to upgrade to Windows 11 and a lack of urgency since Windows 10 is still supported until 2025,” Esben Dochy, technical product evangelist for Lansweeper, wrote in an email reply to Computerworld.

Lansweeper 的技术产品推广员 Esben Dochy 在给《计算机世界》的一封电子邮件中写道，Windows 11没有获得更高的采用率的主要原因“可能是因为升级到 Windows 11的严格要求，以及 Windows 10在2025年之前仍然得到支持，所以缺乏紧迫感。”。

An upgrade to Windows 11 will require a system with 64-bit processors, 4GB of memory, 64GB of storage, UEFI secure boot and the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) v2.0.

升级到 Windows 11将需要一个64位处理器、4gb 内存、64gb 存储空间、 UEFI 安全引导和可信平台模块版本(TPM) v2.0的系统。

Lansweeper 扫地车

Lansweeper gleans its Windows adoption data from more than 10 million devices running on business and home networks. AdDuplex bases its data on about 60,000 Windows 10 or 11 PCs running its monitoring software.

Lansweeper 收集了超过1000万台运行在商业和家庭网络上的设备的 Windows 应用数据。的数据基于运行其监控软件的大约6万台 Windows 10或11台电脑。

Discrepancies among data for OS adoption is not unusual, according to Steve Kleynhans, a vice president of research at Gartner. Sample sizes are typically smaller and small percentages are sensitive to any changes. “It’s important to take all numbers with a grain of salt,” Kleynhans said.

高德纳公司研究副总裁史蒂夫 · 克莱恩汉斯说，操作系统采用数据的差异并不罕见。样本规模通常较小，小百分比对任何变化都很敏感。“对所有的数字都持保留态度是很重要的,”克莱恩汉斯说。

Anecdotally, he said, Windows 11 is faring better in its early release days than Windows 10 did six years ago.

有趣的是，他说，Windows 11在发布初期的表现要好于六年前的 Windows 10。

The latest release of Windows 10 (21H2), which was rolled out on Nov. 16, has reached 3.7% adoption, according to AdDuplex. (There are two Windows versions named 21H2 on the market now. One is from the Windows 10 branch, the other is Windows 11.)

根据 AdDuplex 的数据，11月16日发布的最新版 Windows 10(21H2)已经达到了3.7% 的普及率。(目前市面上有两款名为21h2的 Windows 版本。一个来自 Windows 10分支，另一个来自 Windows 11。)

This is the first time in “modern history” when an "older" version of the OS (Windows 10 21H2) entered the market later than a newer one (Windows 11 21H2), AdDuplex noted on its website.

AdDuplex 在其网站上指出，这是“现代历史”上首次出现“老”版本的操作系统(Windows 1021h2)比新版本(Windows 1121h2)进入市场的时间晚。

If Lansweeper’s data is accurate, more PCs are running Windows XP (3.62%) and Windows 8 (0.95%) than are running Windows 11.

如果 Lansweeper 的数据是准确的，那么运行 Windows XP (3.62%)和 Windows 8(0.95%)的电脑比运行 Windows 11的要多。

For its part, Microsoft said in a blog post that Windows 11 adoption has yielded mostly positive user feedback. As a result, the company is advancing the pace of the rollout faster than it had anticipated, “and [is] now making the Windows 11 upgrade more broadly available to eligible Windows 10 devices,” John Cable, vice president of program management for Windows Servicing and Delivery, wrote in his blog on Nov. 16.

微软在一篇博客文章中表示，Windows 11的应用已经产生了大部分积极的用户反馈。因此，微软正以比预期更快的速度推进 Windows 11升级，“现在，Windows 11升级对合格的 Windows 10设备更为普遍,”Windows service and Delivery 项目管理副总裁约翰 · 凯布尔(John Cable)11月16日在他的博客中写道。

Even so, Lansweeper’s data points to a drip, not a flood, of adoption, with several reasons cited for the less-than-robust uptake of Windows 11 in enterprises.

即便如此，Lansweeper 的数据表明，Windows 11在企业中的应用并不强劲，原因有几个。

For one, Microsoft has said it will continue to support Windows 10 through 2025, offering a much longer runway for corporate upgrades to Windows 11. That allows organizations to take their time planning for, and testing, the new platform.

首先，微软表示将继续支持 Windows 10到2025，为企业升级 Windows 11提供更长的时间。这使得组织能够花时间规划和测试新的平台。

Windows 11 is also a less comprehensive update compared to Windows 10, according to Kleynhans. And, with little to currently gain from moving quickly, organizations don’t have a good reason to install the upgrade right away.

根据 Kleynhans 的说法，与 Windows 10相比，Windows 11的更新不够全面。而且，由于目前快速移动几乎没有什么好处，企业没有很好的理由马上安装升级。

Adware

It’s likely the only users deploying Windows 11 today are doing so outside the approval of their IT shops, Kleynhans added.

克林汉斯补充说，现在很可能只有那些部署 Windows 11的用户没有得到 IT 部门的批准。

“I don’t think you’re going to see enterprises doing anything substantial with Windows 11 until 2023,” Kleynhans said. “They’re thinking they’d like to let it simmer for a while, and let the quirks and issues work themselves out.”

“我认为，在2023年之前，企业在 Windows 11上不会有什么实质性的举动,”克莱恩汉斯说。“他们正在考虑让事情慢慢酝酿一段时间，让这些怪癖和问题自己解决。”

The primary change to Windows 11 is the user interface (UI). Gone in the new OS are Microsoft’s Start menu tiles; they’ve been replaced by icons that look more like the UI on a smartphone or tablet. Windows 11 also reduced the number of dialog boxes that are prevalent on Windows 10.

对 Windows 11的主要更改是用户界面(UI)。新操作系统中已经没有了微软的开始菜单贴图，取而代之的是看起来更像智能手机或平板电脑上的用户界面的图标。Windows 11还减少了 Windows 10上流行的对话框的数量。

“As much as I hate to admit it, because I kind of like tiles, ...they were a failed experiment,” Kleynhans said. “I think going back to something that’s more consistent with what people are used to on their (mobile devices) will play well.”

“尽管我不愿意承认这一点，因为我有点喜欢瓷砖，... ... 但它们是一个失败的实验,”克莱恩汉斯说。“我认为，回到一些更符合人们在移动设备上的习惯的东西上，将会更好。”

Over the next few years, Microsoft will continue to add more significant features to Windows 11 and be able to take advantage of the latest hardware, creating more differentiation from its predecessor.

在接下来的几年里，微软将继续为 Windows 11添加更多重要的功能，并且能够利用最新的硬件，创造出与前一代更多的不同。

Microsoft also likely felt pressure to launch Windows 11 because the PC marketplace was calling for an upgrade that would make better use of new hardware, and the release was well timed for the holiday season, Kleynhans noted.

克林汉斯指出，微软可能也感受到了发布 Windows 11的压力，因为个人电脑市场正在呼吁升级，以便更好地利用新硬件，而且发布的时机正好适合假日季。

For example, Windows 11 can tap into the new speeds and battery features of Intel's new Alder Lake processors. “I don’t think you can say there would have been a better or worse time to launch,” Kleynhans said.

例如，Windows 11可以利用英特尔新款 Alder Lake 处理器的新速度和电池特性。“我不认为你可以说有一个更好或更坏的时间来启动,”克莱恩汉斯说。

Lansweeper also noted in a blog that only 44.4% of current CPUs for workstations meet the system requirements for upgrading to Windows 11; 55.6% did not.

Lansweeper 还在一篇博客中指出，目前只有44.4% 的工作站 cpu 满足升级到 Windows 11的系统要求; 55.6% 的 cpu 不满足。

While the majority of systems Lansweeper measures passed the RAM test (91%), only about half of the workstation Trusted Platform Modules (TPM) tested met the requirements for Windows 11, while over 19% failed. And 28% were not TPM compatible or did not have it enabled, according to Lansweeper.

虽然大多数系统 Lansweeper 测试通过了 RAM 测试(91%) ，但只有大约一半的工作站可信平台模块(TPM)测试满足 Windows 11的要求，而超过19% 的测试失败。根据 Lansweeper 的数据，28% 的人不能兼容 TPM 或者没有启用 TPM。

If enterprises want to start adopting Windows 11, they need to figure out which of their existing devices are capable of upgrading, Dochy advised. “We have a requirements audit that they can use to figure out how many of their devices are even capable of moving to Windows 11. From there on, they can start creating a migration plan for the coming year(s),” he added.

如果企业想要开始采用 Windows 11，他们需要弄清楚他们现有的设备中哪些能够升级，Dochy 建议。“我们有一个需求审计，他们可以用来计算出有多少设备甚至能够移动到 Windows 11。从那时起，他们可以开始为来年制定迁移计划。”。

The idea that Cisco's products are "hardware based" when compared to the two software-based routers reviewed here is a little misleading. Cisco's routers contain a power supply, internal bus, memory (main), storage (flash), a processor and an operating system -- just like any PC. They also have specialized network cards (contained in "modules") capable of handling just about every connection imaginable. In short, Cisco's hardware is nothing more than a specialized computer with modular plug-ins. The major difference is that Cisco's operating system (they call it an "IOS") includes the routing software, whereas the softrouter products we reviewed operate on the Windows family of operating systems. As a result, compatibility problems between the various subsystems of a Cisco router are all but nonexistent. Here are some other comparisons:

认为思科的产品是“基于硬件”的想法相比，这里审查的两个软件路由器是有点误导。思科的路由器包括电源、内部总线、内存(主)、存储器(闪存)、处理器和操作系统——就像任何 PC 一样。它们还有专门的网卡(包含在“模块”中) ，能够处理几乎所有可以想象的连接。简而言之，思科的硬件只不过是一台具有模块化插件的专用计算机。主要区别在于思科的操作系统(他们称之为“ IOS”)包括路由软件，而我们评论的软水槽产品运行在 Windows 系列的操作系统上。因此，Cisco 路由器的各个子系统之间的兼容性问题几乎不存在。下面是一些其他的比较:

COST: Cisco routers will run the small to midsize organization anywhere between $300 and $6,000, depending upon the number of and throughput support of subnets, the type and speed of the uplink, the security options and whether you need voice support. Let's take one of the more common routers in use today -- the Cisco 4500-M. Its throughput capabilities are similar to the systems we tested. The 4500-M supports one 155M bit/sec ATM OC-3 Module, two T-1 ports supporting up to 2.048M bit/sec and up to 16 128K bit/sec low-speed ports. An 800-MHz PC can handle this much bandwidth, which is hardly surprising. Although the 4500-M's components are optimized to do just one thing -- route -- its Reduced Instruction Set Computing processor is only 100 MHz, and its main memory tops out at 32M bytes. If you compare the cost difference for the memory alone, 256M bytes of PC-133 memory for high-end Pentium III's cost just $100, less than one-twentieth the cost per megabyte for that used in the Cisco router.

成本: 根据子网的数量和吞吐量支持、上行链路的类型和速度、安全选项以及是否需要语音支持，Cisco 路由器将在300美元到6000美元之间的任何地方运行中小型组织。让我们以目前使用较为普遍的路由器之一—— Cisco 4500-M 为例。它的吞吐量能力与我们测试的系统相似。4500-M 支持一个155m 位/秒的 ATM oc-3模块，两个 t-1端口支持高达2.048 m 位/秒和高达16个128k 位/秒的低速端口。一台800兆赫的 PC 能够处理这么大的带宽，这并不令人惊讶。尽管4500-m 的组件被优化为只能做一件事情---- 路由---- 它的精简指令集处理器只有100mhz，而且它的主存最高可达32m 字节。如果你比较一下内存的成本差异，2.56亿字节的 pc-133内存的高端奔腾 III 的成本只有100美元，不到思科路由器每兆字节成本的二十分之一。

However, cost isn't everything, and appearances can be deceiving. The 4500-M has a lot of advantages over a comparably equipped software/PC product, including more built-in LAN and WAN protocols, optimized WAN services, and the ability to centrally install and manage your internetworking infrastructure. Besides -- you'll gain a greater uptime rating with a Cisco or other mainstream router product than you will with one that runs as an application or a service on Windows. It still costs $2,000 more than either of the softrouters (including the server hardware) we reviewed, and that doesn't include hiring the services of a Cisco-certified installer. Before making a decision, first consider the target market.

然而，成本并不是一切，外表可能具有欺骗性。4500-M 比同等配备的软件/PC 产品有许多优点，包括更多内置的局域网和广域网协议、优化的广域网服务，以及集中安装和管理互联网基础设施的能力。除此之外---- 你使用思科或其他主流路由器产品的正常运行时间会比使用 Windows 应用程序或服务的正常运行时间更长。它仍然比我们评测的任何一款软件(包括服务器硬件)贵2000美元，这还不包括聘请思科认证的安装程序员。在作出决定之前，首先要考虑目标市场。

PRODUCT POSITION: Tiny Software's WinRoute Pro is more appropriate for a branch office, while Vicomsoft's Internet Gateway is lends itself toward the corporate office, particularly because it can handle multiplee connections from branch offices, or even dial-up users (via a pooled remote-access server). Some corporations are beginning to take their workgroups, with their specific security requirements, and throw them behind software-based network address translation (NAT) routers such as these.

产品定位: Tiny Software 的 WinRoute Pro 更适合分支机构，而 Vicomsoft 的 Internet Gateway 则适用于公司办公室，特别是因为它可以处理来自分支机构的多路连接，甚至可以处理拨号用户(通过汇集的远程访问服务器)。一些公司开始利用他们的工作组，以及他们特定的安全需求，把它们放在基于软件的网络地址转换(NAT)路由器之后。

Can either product handle the needs of a large corporation, say, with 5,000 users or more? Many such corporations often connect to the Internet with nothing more than one or two T-1 lines, for less than 5M bit/sec bandwidth. Both products can handle up to six times that throughput on a fast PC. Still, Internet Gateway limited itself to 1,024 users if DHCP was being used, and WinRoute Pro's e-mail services would add significant overhead if used by more than a few dozen people. Whether you would ever use either of these products in that large and diverse of an environment would depend entirely upon your current and future internetworking needs. Most such corporations would require the significantly more diverse capabilities delivered by Cisco's line of higher-end routers.

这两种产品都能满足大公司的需求吗? 比如说，拥有5000或更多用户的公司？许多这样的公司通常只用一条或两条 t-1线连接互联网，带宽不到5m 位/秒。这两种产品在一台快速个人电脑上的吞吐量都可以达到这个数字的六倍。尽管如此，如果使用 DHCP，Internet Gateway 将自身限制为1024个用户，而且如果超过几十人使用 WinRoute Pro 的电子邮件服务，将增加大量开销。您是否会在如此庞大和多样化的环境中使用这两种产品中的任何一种，将完全取决于您当前和未来的网络互联需求。大多数这样的公司将需要思科系列高端路由器提供的更多样化的功能。

RELIABILITY: If you installed these products on a clean system, with the latest service packs and security patches, and didn't load any other software, and enabled NAT, they'd be just as secure as any offering by Cisco. The "blue screen of death" is a phenomenon usually related to cutting-edge video cards (and their newly written drivers) or buggy network card drivers.

可靠性: 如果你将这些产品安装在一个干净的系统上，使用最新的服务包和安全补丁，并且不加载任何其他软件，同时启用 NAT，那么它们将和思科提供的任何产品一样安全。“蓝屏死机”是一种现象，通常与尖端视频卡(及其新编写的驱动程序)或有缺陷的网卡驱动程序有关。

Although NAT was originally designed for IP consolidation and conservation, it doesn't operate from within the operating system, but installs itself between the hardware layer and the IP stack, and so has unfettered access to and control over all packets before they can be of any harm. The result is increased security. NAT is integral to Internet Gateway and WinRoute Pro, while Cisco uses NAT in its IOS with full NAT capability in IOS Versions 12.0 and beyond. Both implementations adhere to RFC 1631, which describes IP NAT in detail.

虽然 NAT 最初是为 IP 整合和保护而设计的，但它并不是在操作系统内部运行，而是在硬件层和 IP 栈之间安装自己，因此在所有数据包可能造成任何危害之前，它可以自由访问和控制所有数据包。其结果是安全性得到提高。NAT 是 Internet Gateway 和 WinRoute Pro 不可或缺的一部分，而 Cisco 在 IOS 版本12.0和更高版本中使用了全面的 NAT 能力。两个实现都遵循 RFC 1631，其中详细描述了 IP NAT。

Cisco's depth of experience in internetworking is clear in its implementation of NAT because it not only hides the IP address of internal users from the outside, but it can also hide the IP address of external source addresses from those on the inside, which is a good way to keep key internetworking resources hidden from potentially malicious employees.

思科在网络互联方面的丰富经验在 NAT 的实现上是显而易见的，因为它不仅可以对外隐藏内部用户的 IP 地址，而且还可以对内部用户隐藏外部源地址的 IP 地址，这是保护关键网络资源不被潜在的恶意雇员发现的好方法。

If you want to keep the bad guys out of your network, there's really no difference between the two in terms of their level of security. Even Cisco's use of NAT in PIX is fundamentally the same as its use in its IOS. Still, Cisco's routers are significantly better at resisting denial-of-service attacks, mainly because Cisco's IOS is both the operating system and the routing/security software in one package. Not only is this far more condensed and less complicated than Windows, but it also tends to be significantly faster, and can be quickly updated by Cisco whenever it learns of a new type of attack -- much like Symantec can update its virus definition files several times an month. The Cisco approach is far more condensed and less complicated than Windows, and tends to be significantly faster. It also can be quickly updated whenever Cisco learns of a new type of attack -- much like Symantec can update its virus definition files several times an month.

如果你想让坏人远离你的网络，这两者在安全级别上真的没有什么区别。甚至思科在 PIX 中使用的 NAT 和它在 IOS 中使用的 NAT 是完全一样的。不过，思科的路由器在抵御拒绝服务攻击方面明显优于其他路由器，这主要是因为思科的 IOS 既是操作系统，又是一个路由/安全软件包。它不仅比 Windows 更简洁、更简洁，而且速度更快，一旦思科发现新型攻击，它就可以迅速更新---- 就像赛门铁克一个月可以更新几次病毒定义文件一样。思科的方法远比 Windows 更简洁、更简单，而且往往要快得多。它还可以在思科发现新型攻击时迅速更新——就像赛门铁克每月可以更新病毒定义文件数次一样。

This story, "Soft vs. hard routers" was originally published by Network World.

这个故事，“软与硬路由器”最初由网络世界出版。

远程访问可以帮助您通过互联网将一台计算机远程连接到另外一台计算机，从而实现远程控制需求，在远程办公、远程协助朋友解决计算机问题、远程为客户提供专业技术支持等多个方面作出了很大的贡献。

既然远程访问的作用这么大，那么是否有不错的免费远程桌面软件推荐？免费远程控制软件哪个好用呢？别着急，请您继续往下阅读。

五个免费远程控制软件推荐！

接下来我们将为您分享五个不同的免费远程控制软件，并且附带了怎么远程控制的详细操作流程，可以帮助您轻松地建立远程控制连接！

软件一：谷歌远程桌面

谷歌远程桌面，其实是谷歌浏览器的扩展功能，支持Mac、Windows或Linux计算机，是一个比较不错的免费远程控制软件。如果您想要使用它进行远程访问，您需要在两台计算机上安装谷歌浏览器并登录到您相同的谷歌帐户。

注意：谷歌远程桌面窗口仅在Web上显示，不提供拖放文件传输、远程计算机重启和文本聊天等功能。

我们该如何使用谷歌远程桌面进行远程访问呢？具体操作流程如下：

步骤1. 在计算机中运行谷歌浏览器并进入谷歌远程桌面，然后单击下载图标在谷歌浏览器中下载免费的远程访问扩展。

步骤2. 然后将谷歌远程桌面扩展程序添加到谷歌浏览器。

 

步骤3. 进入“远程支持”界面，点击“共享此屏幕”下的蓝色“生成代码”按钮，生成此计算机的一次性访问代码。

步骤4. 在控制者计算机中，下载并启用谷歌远程桌面，然后登录到同一个谷歌帐户。在“远程支持”界面上，找到下面的远程设备，再输入受控者计算机自动生成的代码即可建立远程连接。

软件二：Windows远程桌面

Windows内置的免费远程控制软件（微软远程桌面）允许您通过IP地址或计算机名称从一台电脑远程控制另一台电脑。支持Windows 10/8.1（不支持家庭版）或Windows Server 2019/2016/2012 R2，并且这两台计算机需要处于相同局域网内，否则您需要设置VPN或转发端口，这对于普通用户来说可能过于复杂。

步骤1. 在计算机上依次单击“开始”>“设置”>“系统”>“远程桌面”，然后点击滑块启用远程桌面。

 

步骤2. 单击“选择可远程访问这台电脑的用户”，然后在弹出窗口中点击“添加”以添加可以远程连接到此计算机的用户（添加后的计算机才具有访问此电脑的权利）。

 

步骤3. 在控制者计算机中的搜索框中搜索并运行“远程桌面连接”。

步骤4. 输入受控者电脑IP并单击“连接”。

 

步骤5. 在输入凭据窗口中输入受控者电脑用户名和密码，然后单击“确定”。

步骤6. 您可能会收到一条消息提示“无法验证远程计算机的身份。是否仍要连接？”单击“是”即可控制远程计算机。之后，您可以编写未完成的文档或提供远程技术支持。

注意：如果您在使用过程中遇到了远程桌面无法连接到远程计算机问题，请您参阅解决Windows无法连接到远程计算机的五个方法。

软件三：Windows远程协助

Windows远程协助允许位于其他位置的技术支持专业人员查看计算机屏幕并控制计算机，也是一个免费且好用的远程控制软件。它通过密码和控制计算机生成的文件连接到另一台计算机，仅可以执行一对一操作，适用于Windows 10/8.1和Windows Server 2019/2016/2012 R2。

步骤1. 按Win+R输入msra并按Enter键打开Windows远程协助。

步骤2. 在弹出窗口中选择“邀请信任的人帮助你”。

 

步骤3. 然后选择“将该邀请另存为文件”。

 

步骤4. 将该文件发送给受控者，然后双击打开并输入对应的密码，然后单击“确定”。

 

步骤5. 成功建立远程协助连接之后，您可以帮助对方解决各类问题或者提供远程技术支持。

软件四：Windows快速助手

快速助手是一个新的Windows功能，也可以将其视为一个免费远程控制软件，允许您接收远程连接，或通过登录微软帐户并填写数字代码来提供帮助。在远程会话期间，可以对受控屏幕进行注释并在线聊天。另外，在进行远程连接之前，受控端需要手动接受请求，并且在远程控制过程中可以任意暂停连接，以确保个人隐私和安全。

步骤1. 在搜索框中搜索并运行“快速助手”。

步骤2. 单击弹出窗口下方的“协助他人”按钮。

 

步骤3. 在共享选项窗口中选择您想要执行的远程方式，然后单击“继续”。

 

步骤4. 受控者计算机同样打开Windows快速助手，然后在“获取协助”一栏中将控制者计算机安全代码填入其中，然后单击“共享屏幕”。

步骤5. 等待双方再次确认一次后，受控者计算机将出现提示弹窗，单击“允许”后即可成功建立远程控制连接。

 

软件五：傲梅远程桌面软件（推荐）

如果您觉得以上四种免费远程控制软件的操作方法有些困难，那么傲梅远程桌面软件——AnyViewer将会是您不错的选择！它的用户界面整洁直观，操作方法简单易学，并且兼容性强，适用于Windows 10/8.1/8/7和Windows Server 2019/2016/2012 R2，是一个简单实用的远程桌面软件。

赶紧到官网下载或者直接点击下方按钮下载安装傲梅远程桌面软件，然后跟着我们的演示流程一起学习怎么远程控制另一台计算机吧！

步骤1. 在控制者和接受者计算机上皆下载安装并运行傲梅远程访问软件，然后在控制者计算机AnyViewer主界面右侧输入接受者计算机设备ID，然后单击“连接”。

 

步骤2. 在弹出窗口中选择“向伙伴发送控制请求”，如果接受者设置了安全码，您还可以选择“输入安全码”来建立远程控制连接。

 

步骤3. 接受者计算机将会出现一个请求控制窗口弹出，您可以选择“同意”或“拒绝”来确认是否建立远程控制连接。

 

☛ 提示：AnyViewer提供的两种安全码形式。

一、临时安全码：在接受者计算机AnyViewer主界面中单击“设置”>“接受者”，然后选择“启用临时安全码”，此后接受者AnyViewer主界面上会显示一个临时安全码（此临时安全码会在每次重启AnyViewer的时候重置），控制者需要输入这个临时安全码才能成功建立远程控制连接。

二、安全码：在接受者计算机AnyViewer主界面中单击“设置”>“接受者”，然后选择“设置我的安全码”，然后在下方长条框中设置自己的安全码（此安全码不会重置），控制者需要输入这个安全码才能成功建立远程控制连接。

 

结论

本文为您介绍了五种不同的免费远程控制软件，可以帮助您解决远程访问需求，其中谷歌远程桌面需要用到谷歌账号，Windows远程桌面、远程协助与快速助手的前期设置又过于繁琐复杂，因此，如果您想要更加轻松愉快地建立远程控制连接，我们推荐您使用傲梅远程桌面软件AnyViewer，简单快速，是一个非常不错的远程桌面软件，赶紧下载体验体验吧！